Training for Patients with Melanoma and Their Partners on Skin Examinations
Skin self-examination (SSE) training to aid early detection of melanoma recurrence is beneficial for patients with melanoma and their partners. The training could have additional benefits for those who report having low relationship quality because it gives them activities to do together, according to an article published online by JAMA Dermatology (2015; doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2819).
Melanoma remains a significant public health concern with an estimated 73,000 new cases of invasive melanoma and more than 9,900 deaths expected to occur in 2015. Melanoma is a treatable cancer with a high survival rate, if it is detected early.
People with prior melanoma diagnoses are 10 times more likely to develop additional melanomas, making them an important population on which to focus early detection. Melanomas detected during SSE are more likely to have favorable outcomes. However, many areas on the body are difficult to examine by oneself so a skin-check partner is beneficial.
JAMA Dermatology Editor June K. Robinson, MD, of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, and coauthors examined for whom a SSE training intervention works best in a sample of pairs of melanoma patients and their partners (a cohabitating spouse or committed partner or a noncohabitating friend, child, parent, sibling, or other relative).
The study, which included 494 patients with melanoma and their skin-check partners, was conducted at Northwestern Medicine ambulatory care dermatology offices from June 2011 to April 2014. Of the patients, 395 were randomly assigned to the intervention and 99 patients served as a control group to receive customary care. Both patients and their partners were on average age 55 years.
In the intervention, patients and their skin-check partners received skills training to assess moles, along with a ruler and a lighted magnifying lens, a laminated card with the ABCDE (Assess Border, Color, Diameter and Evolution of pigmented lesions) rules and a map of the body. During a clinical visit, the dermatologist also invited the partner to join the examination of the patient's back as part of the intervention. Patients and their partners in the control group received no such skills training and were not invited by the dermatologist to review the patient's back during a clinic visit.
The authors reported that the intervention increased patient SSE self-efficacy scores, which gauge confidence in performing SSE. Partner motivation did not affect patient SSE self-efficacy.
However, how the intervention affected patient SSE self-efficacy had an an effect on relationship variables (happiness and activities performed with the partner), with the greatest benefit of SSE education identified in those pairs who spend the least time together and have the least happiness, according to the study.
“While dermatologists are most likely not going to be able to change relationship quality, pairs who were given an activity of partner-assisted SSE to perform together did so; thus, pairs with low relationship quality increased their activities performed with their partner. Since these individuals showed the largest increase in patient SSE self-efficacy after they received the SSE training, dermatologists or health care professionals should consider recommending SSE training for these individuals and their partners,” the authors concluded.