Obese men were more likely to have precancerous lesions detected in their benign prostate biopsies compared with nonobese men, and they were at a greater risk for subsequently developing prostate cancer, according to a new study.
“Our study is focused on a large group of men who have had a prostate biopsy that is benign but are still at a very high risk for prostate cancer,” said the study’s first author Andrew Rundle, DrPH, Associate Professor of Epidemiology at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. “Studies conducted in the past have attempted to determine if there are subpopulations of men diagnosed with benign conditions that may be at a greater risk for developing prostate cancer. Here we were able to show that obesity is associated with a significantly higher risk of prostate cancer after an initial benign biopsy, particularly in the first few years after a biopsy. This was also one of the first studies to assess the association between obesity and precancerous abnormalities in the benign biopsy tissue specimens.”
Rundle and colleagues investigated the association between obesity and future prostate cancer incidence within a cohort of 6,692 men at the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Michigan, who were followed for 14 years after a biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate with benign findings.
The researchers conducted a case-control study among 494 of these patients and 494 matched controls; they found precancerous abnormalities in 11% of the patients’ benign specimens. These abnormalities were significantly associated with obesity at the time of the procedure, stated Rundle.
After accounting for several variables, including family history of prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during the initial procedure, and the number of PSA tests and digital rectal exams during follow-up, obesity at the time of the initial procedure was found to be associated with a 57% increased incidence of prostate cancer during follow-up. This research was published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention (2013; doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0965).
Rundle noted, however, that this association was only apparent for tumors occurring earlier in the follow-up period. “We don’t absolutely know what the true biology is. In some ways, this reflects the association between the body size and larger prostate size, which is thought to reduce the sensitivity of the needle biopsy. It is possible that the tumors missed by initial biopsy grew and were detected in a follow-up biopsy.”
The association observed between body size and prostate cancer risk is greater than that seen in prior studies, according to Rundle. He attributed the discrepancy to differences between the cohorts studied; the current study was composed only of men at high risk for prostate cancer. In addition, since these high-risk men were members of the comprehensive Henry Ford Medical System, they underwent increased medical surveillance, which included repeated biopsy and regular PSA screening.
“Obesity should be considered a factor for more intensive follow-up after a benign prostate biopsy,” said Rundle.