Measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) alone at the end of induction therapy was not predictive of risk or outcome in children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Results of this study were published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer (2015; doi:10.1002/pbc.25582).
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer. This disease includes two subtypes, B-cell and T-cell leukemia, depending upon the type of white blood cell where the leukemia originates. For B-cell ALL, the presence of a small number of remaining leukemia cells, or the minimal residual disease, predicts risk of relapse and is therefore used to guide treatment decisions.
A team of investigators at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles in California, led by Hisham Abdel-Azim, MD, conducted a historical cohort analysis and found that MRD alone, at the end of induction therapy, was not predictive of risk or outcome in children with T-ALL.
“Until now, the dogma has been that for patients with leukemia who have minimal residual disease at the end of induction, we need to intensify their treatment, which also increases side effects,” said Abdel-Azim, who is also an assistant professor of Pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California. “We have found for T-ALL, patients have excellent outcomes without therapy intensification and its associated toxicities.”
Following induction therapy, minimal residual disease was determined by flow cytometry for 33 children with newly diagnosed T-ALL, and 19 were found to have MRD. At a median of 4 years follow-up, there were no relapses among the patients with MRD and 32 of 33 patients remained in complete remission.
The investigators concluded that clearance of leukemia cells from the blood is slower in patients with T-ALL compared with patients with B-ALL; however, leukemia cells ultimately are cleared without changes in therapy.
Funding was provided in part by the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, NIH K12HD052954 award, and the Joseph Drown Foundation.