Oncology nurses are most often addressing an affected cancer patient when discussing treatment options. In the realm of genetics, however, often the same organizations that treat persons with cancer also address the needs of persons with a genetic mutation, or a hereditary predisposition to developing cancer: a previvor. But what is a cancer previvor?

FORCE (Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered), a national nonprofit organization dedicated to support and advocacy for persons at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers, defines a previvor as “a survivor of a predisposition to cancer.”1 The risk of breast cancer for carriers of the BRCA gene mutation is up to 84%, compared with 8% for persons without the genetic mutation.2,3 A person whose risk for cancer is associated with a diagnosed genetic mutation would be considered a previvor.

Considering the difference between survivorship versus previvorship, the psychological distress of previvors could be distinctly different from that of survivors. The impact of weighing treatment options for a known cancer, or a history of cancer, may be different from the impact of weighing those same options as prevention strategies. For example, a woman who does not have cancer would consider a radical procedure such as a bilateral oophorectomy. In effect, she will go into the surgery for the most part as a well person, but soon afterward, she will experience all the issues that come with menopause.

Continue Reading

Guilt and grief can also be associated with the diagnosis of a genetic mutation. Women, often in the position of caregiver and care promoter, are now confronted with the associated cancer potential not just for themselves, but their sisters, brothers, children, and other family members as well. However, other sources of psychological distress may also be factors in quality of life (QOL) for previvors. An interesting point to consider is whether these sources of distress are different from those of BRCA-positive cancer survivors, or do the two groups of mutation carriers experience similar amounts of psychological distress.

While developing a genetics program, we considered a few issues voiced by BRCA mutation previvors. One issue was referrals to cancer support groups as a source of support. The women expressed feeling out of place in those support groups and not able to voice concerns with cancer survivors, as they had not had cancer. Another issue articulated was frustration with making treatment decisions. The previvors stated many times that they were not prepared for the side effects of preventive surgery and the impact of those side effects on their relationships.


In a study by the Center for Genetics and Hereditary Disease at Celebration Health, data were collected on the psychological needs of BRCA mutation carriers via surveys during the 2012 annual FORCE Conference. Surveys used were the Rand 36-Item Health Survey, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ), and a general questionnaire, as well as anthropometrics and a 3-day food diary. Other issues studied in relation to psychological well-being included vital signs, sleep, sex life, and associated impediments (ie, vaginal dryness, reduced desire, and poor body image). The participants were given all the survey results in an information packet the same day they took the surveys as well as information on healthy lifestyles and disease prevention. A total of 107 people were included in the study: 36 survivors of breast and ovarian cancers who had the BRCA mutation, 45 previvors with the BRCA mutation, and 26 controls with no history of cancer or BRCA mutations.

In the domains associated with physical functioning, the cancer survivors reported a statistically significant decrease in quality of life compared with previvors and the control group (Table 1). Both groups of BRCA mutation carriers had a significantly greater level of anxiety than the control group (P<.0001). Emotional distress was also more prevalent in the BRCA mutation carriers than in the control group, as evidenced by their lower scores (P=.02) on the SF-36 emotional scales. Significant effectors of psychological status (P<.05) included BRCA mutation diagnosis, quality of sex life, and presence of associated impediments. These findings were consistent with the consensus of focus groups that took place during the FORCE Conference. Participants expressed anxiety and lower emotional status. Findings from the study support concerns voiced by BRCA mutation carriers.

Table 1. Quality of life of BRCA mutation carriers

QoL scale Controls Previvors Survivors
Well-being (emotional) 80.0±2.6 70.6±2.3a 74.0±2.21a
Limitations/emotional 93.1±2.4 84.1±4.0a 75.6±6.0a
Physical functioning 89.3±4.8 91.9±2.1 85.1±3.4
Limitations/physical 95.5±2.1 92.0±3.02 70.3±6.5a,b
Pain 86.9±3.3 84.6±2.69 74.6±3.8a,b
General health 79.3±2.7 69.9±2.6a 67.7±2.6a
Social functioning 89.7±2.7 83.5±2.6 80.0±4.0
Energy/fatigue 62.8±3.3 54.3±2.6a 52.2±3.6a

Key: QoL, quality of life.
aP < .05 Controls. bP < .05 Previvors.

Continued assessment of quality of life in BRCA mutation carriers is essential. Due to the significant decrease in cancer risk by many of the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk-reducing strategies, a strong argument can be made for BRCA testing. However, health care providers must also consider the emotional toll the decision to undergo testing, and the potential diagnosis, take on patients and their families. Providing adequate information prior to and after testing is the responsibility of anyone who recommends genetic testing. Genetic counselors should be consulted to ensure appropriate counseling is given to anyone who is considering testing or learning to cope with the results. Previvors and cancer survivors with BRCA gene mutations have greater psychological distress (lower emotional QOL, higher anxiety) than do people who do not carry the mutation (Figure 1).