Response-guided neoadjuvant chemo valuable for breast cancer

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemo Beneficial in Breast CA
Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemo Beneficial in Breast CA

(HealthDay News) -- For patients with early breast cancer, a response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach seems beneficial, according to a study published online Sept. 3 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Gunter von Minckwitz, M.D., from the Institute for Pathology in Berlin, and colleagues examined disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with early breast cancer after treatment with response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 2,072 patients were treated with two cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC). Responders were randomized to four or six additional TAC cycles (704 and 686 patients, respectively), while early non-responders were assigned to four cycles of TAC (321) or vinorelbine and capecitabine (NX; 301 patients) before surgery.

The researchers found that DFS was significantly longer for early responders assigned to eight sessions of TAC versus six sessions (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78) and in early non-responders receiving TAC-NX versus six sessions of TAC (HR, 0.59). Compared with conventional chemotherapy (six sessions of TAC), response-guided therapy (eight sessions of TAC or TAC-NX) correlated with significantly longer DFS (HR, 0.71) and OS (HR, 0.79) in exploratory analysis. In all hormone receptor-positive tumors, but not hormone receptor-negative tumors, DFS was longer after response-guided chemotherapy.

"This exploratory analysis suggests that response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve survival and is most effective in hormone receptor-positive tumors," the authors write. "If confirmed, the response-guided approach could provide a clinically meaningful advantage for the neoadjuvant over the adjuvant approach in early breast cancer."

Several authors disclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, including Amgen, Chugai, Roche, and sanofi-aventis, all of which funded the study.

Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

You must be a registered member of ONA to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Genitourinary Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Rare Cancers Regimens
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs