Molecular breast imaging protocol unmasks more cancer in advanced cases
Patients with advanced breast cancer that may have spread to their lymph nodes could benefit from a more robust dose of a molecular imaging agent when undergoing lymphoscintigraphy. This functional imaging technique scouts for new cancer as it begins to metastasize. Best results also indicate that imaging could be improved by injecting the agent, Tc-99m filtered sulfur colloid, the day prior to surgical resection. This research was shared at the 2014 Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Annual Meeting in St Louis, Missouri.
“The innovative aspect of this study was our recent introduction of day-before-surgery injections for breast cancer patients,” said Donald Neumann, MD, research scientist and practicing physician from the department of nuclear medicine at Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio.
“Prior to this, we routinely injected patients on the day of surgery. There were several motivating factors for us to do this. Typically, surgeries begin very early in the morning, and it is very difficult to arrange all the necessary equipment, personnel and radiotracers early enough in the morning for patients to be injected, scanned, have their images interpreted, and travel (or be transported) to surgical check-in.”
The researchers also enhanced the activity of the agent as imaged by lymphoscintigraphy by increasing the standard patient dose to 3.0 millicuries of Tc-99m filtered sulfur colloid up from 0.4 millicuries.
The change in injection timing from the morning of surgery to the day prior to surgery was based on study data. Of a group of 51 patients who were imaged the day prior, 39 had cancer that had spread to their lymph nodes and 12 patients' scans showed multiple lymph node malignancies.
A separate group of 49 patients were injected with the agent the morning of their surgery. Of these, 24 patients had cancer that had metastasized to their lymph nodes. Imaging the morning prior to surgery resulted in a higher sensitivity of detection of advanced breast cancer compared with imaging on the day of surgery: 76% sensitive versus 49%, respectively.