For prostate cancer screening, guidelines have little effect on clinical practice
the ONA take:
According to a new study published online in The Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, guidelines recommending that clinicians should not routinely screen elderly men for prostate cancer have had a minimal effect on practice. Researchers from Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, sought to find out whether a change in prostate screening guidelines by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) had altered practice in the last 3 years since the USPSTF recommended against routine prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in any age group.
By using the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the researchers examined which factors influence whether a patient is screened for prostate cancer, including access to health care, age, education, ethnicity/race, geographic location, income, insurance status, and marital status. They found that access to regular health care was strongly associated with increased rates of PSA screening.
In addition, they found an association between screening and an income greater than $75,000, higher education, health insurance, and an age between 70 and 74. Surprisingly, Hawaii has double the rate of PSA screening compared with New Hampshire.
The researchers suggest that the USPSTF guidelines have little effect on clinical practice.
Guidelines recommending not routinely screening have had a minimal effect on practice.
The effect of guidelines recommending that elderly men should not be routinely screened for prostate cancer "has been minimal at best," according to a new study led by researchers at Henry Ford Hospital.
The study, published as a research letter online in JAMA Internal Medicine, focused on the use of PSA - prostate-specific antigen - to test for prostate cancer. "We found that the effect of the guidelines recommending against the routine screening of elderly men in particular has been minimal at best," says Jesse Sammon, D.O., a researcher at Henry Ford's Vattikuti Urology Institute and lead author of the study.
The researchers found an estimated 17 million men age 50 or older without a history of prostate cancer or prostate problems who reported undergoing PSA screening. Though credited with a significant improvement in 5-year cancer survival rates during the first decade after the FDA approved PSA testing of men without symptoms, its use for routine screening is controversial.
- Osteoporosis Medication Improves Bone Health in ADT-Treated Prostate Cancer
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Granted FDA Approval for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Cabazitaxel in Prostate Cancer: Reduced Dose Noninferior to Standard Dose
- Risk of Some Cancers Higher in Women With a History of Periodontal Disease
- Breast Conservation Improves Survival vs Mastectomy in Breast Cancer
- To Better Serve Patients With Cancer, Navigators Need Better Systems
- Physical Activity Improves Cognitive Function for Breast Cancer Survivors
- Risk of Lung Cancer Increases With Diets Higher in Saturated Fats
- Mechanisms Identified for Curcumin Resensitization of Cancer Cells
- Value of Type and Crossmatch Prior to Daratumumab Administration
- Affect of Daratumumab on Laboratory Blood Test Results
- Geriatric Consults Rare in Kidney Cancer Care
- Worse Survival Seen for Alternative Versus Usual Cancer Therapy
- Anorexia-Cachexia in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Improved With Anamorelin
- Early Recognition of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis Improves Outcomes
Sign Up for Free e-newsletters
Regimen and Drug Listings
GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION
|Head and Neck Cancer||Regimens||Drugs|