Imaging

Pericardial Effusion

Preliminary Diagnosis: Pericardial Effusion

I. What imaging technique is first-line for this diagnosis?

Echocardiography

II. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of this technique for diagnosing pericardial effusion.

Advantages

  • Does not expose patients to ionizing radiation.

  • Highly portable.

  • Offers exquisite detail of the valvular structures and helps measure cardiac chamber pressures further detailing underlying cardiac pathology.

  • Best imaging tool and offers a persistent echo free space between the parietal and visceral pericardium throughout the cardiac cycle.

  • Offers better visualization of frond like, band like, or shaggy intrapericardial echoes in complicated effusions.

Disadvantages

  • Operator dependent.

III. What are the contraindications for the first-line imaging technique?

No specific contraindications to ultrasound exist.

IV. What alternative imaging techniques are available?

  • Plain radiography of the chest (PA and lateral view of the chest).

  • CT imaging of the pericardium.

  • Cardiac MR imaging.

V. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative techniques for diagnosing pericardial effusion.

Plain radiography of the chest (PA and lateral view of the chest)

Advantages

  • Highly portable.

  • Relatively inexpensive imaging modality.

Disadvantages

  • Has limited sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing pericardial effusion.

  • Fat pad sign on lateral film is less sensitive.

  • Flask shaped enlargement of cardiac silhouette is nonspecific.

  • Offers limited sensitivity in characterizing the surrounding soft tissues, vasculature, and osseous structures.

  • Less adept in directing treatment.

CT imaging of the pericardium

Advantages

  • May help characterize the size and distribution of the effusion.

  • May help characterize the type of effusion.

  • May help detect associated pleural thickening.

  • May help guide treatment and therapy.

Disadvantages

  • Exposes patients to ionizing radiation.

Cardiac MR imaging

Advantages

  • May help characterize the nature of the pericardial effusion and evaluate for any pericardial thickening.

  • Does not expose patients to ionizing radiation.

Disadvantages

  • May be subject to motion artifact due to the cardiac cycle, and must be cardiac gated.

  • Expensive.

  • Time consuming.

VI. What are the contraindications for the alternative imaging techniques?

Plain radiography of the chest (PA and lateral view of the chest)

  • No specific contraindications to plain radiography exist. Some institutions may require consent for pregnant women.

CT imaging of the pericardium

  • May be contraindicated in pregnant patients.

Cardiac MR imaging

  • Contraindicated in patients with non-MR compatible hardware.

You must be a registered member of ONA to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Genitourinary Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Rare Cancers Regimens
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs