Patient Disparity in Trials vs Clinic Raises Doubts on Kidney Cancer Drug Efficacy
the ONA take:
Four drugs that were recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of kidney cancer are being doubted for their clinical application based on trial data, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Oncology Practice.
Researchers led by Aaron Mitchell, MD, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Medical Center, found that with regard to certain cancer drugs, participants in clinical trials are often not representative of patients that ultimately take the drugs.
“We found that patients participating in clinical trials are younger and healthier than many of the patients who are receiving these drugs in the clinical setting,” Mitchell said.
The study compared patients who participated in stage III clinical trials for four kidney cancer drugs with those who received the drugs at both academic and community medical centers.
The researchers found that 39% of the patients who received the drugs would have been considered too sick to participate in the original trials, and therefore would have been excluded.
“If a person will be getting the drug in a clinical setting it is important to know if they can expect to see the same benefits or if they might experience more dangerous side effects,” Mitchell noted.
“Physicians can’t know for sure because the trial data do not directly apply.”
He urged that since current trials are designed by pharmaceutical companies to make them “more expedient,” it may be more realistic to change the perception that FDA approval is the end point for studying a drug efficacy.
Four drugs that were recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of kidney cancer are being doubted for their clinical application.
- Response to Anemia Treatment Differs in Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
- Fertility Preservation in Male Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
- Impact of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment Choice on Quality of Life
- Social, Psychiatric Variables Reduce Cognitive Functioning, QoL in HNC
- Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Predictive for Lymphedema in Breast Cancer
- HPV and Cancer (Fact Sheet)
- Pain Control More Easily Achieved With Nurse-Led Education in Bone Metastases
- Acupuncture an Effective Alternative Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue
- Using Nutrition-Based Strategies to Manage Adverse Effects of Cancer
- Palliative Care Associated With Decreased Costs For Patients With Advanced Cancer
- Refined Equation May Obviate Oncotype DX in Breast Cancer Treatment Decisions
- Risk Factors for Brain Metastases in HER2+ Breast Cancer Identified in Analysis
- Intermediate Oncotype DX Scores Prognostic of OS in Early-stage Breast Cancer
- Colorectal Cancer and Dietary Fiber: Source Is More Important Than Amount
- Reduced Delayed Intensification Impacts Risk of Pediatric ALL Relapse
Sign Up for Free e-newsletters
Regimen and Drug Listings
GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION
|Head and Neck Cancer||Regimens||Drugs|